Why financially secure retirees still hesitate to act – and what advisers can do about it

Why do financially secure retirees still hesitate to make the decisions retirement requires? Advisers often see clients delay strategies, hold back spending or avoid commitments that could improve their financial security. The explanation may lie in how retirees mentally frame the future.

 

Key points

  • Retirees hesitate to make financial decisions due to complexity, biases and future uncertainty.
  • Retirement viewed as two chapters: vivid early years, abstract later.
  • Spending declines, decision inertia is often driven by fear.
  • Confidence enables spending early, reduces fear in later years.
  • Advisers should treat confidence as outcome of planning.

 

Many think about retirement in two chapters: the early years they can clearly imagine and the later years they struggle to picture. That distinction shapes how clients perceive risk, flexibility and ‘irreversible decisions’ and ultimately how confidently they act on strategies that could optimise their retirement.

The emerging risk to retirement outcomes

For many Australians, the greatest emerging threat to retirement outcomes is no longer market volatility or inadequate savings, but hesitation to make the decisions retirement requires. Increasing system complexity and behavioural biases are leaving many well-resourced retirees reluctant to spend, commit capital or implement strategies that could improve both their financial and emotional security.

Recent Australian research1 shows this persistent decision paralysis is creating a gap between the retirement people have the financial capacity to achieve and the retirement they feel confident to live. While traditional retirement income planning focuses on sustaining target income levels, advice processes alone cannot resolve the concerns that lead many retirees to live an overly cautious retirement.

To build genuine confidence, advisers must recognise the tension clients experience between enjoying the present and managing future uncertainty.

In practice, this tension manifests as a two-chapter view of retirement: an initial 10–15-year period of active “golden years” that clients can readily envision and plan for, followed by a later, more uncertain period characterised by anxiety about health, longevity and financial needs. Recognising this mindset matters because it shapes how clients respond to advice, perceive risk and evaluate strategies from the outset.

How retirees actually think about the future

Many advisers will be familiar with Michael Stein’s classic three-phase view of retirement spending: the ‘go-go’, the ‘slow-go’, and the ‘no-go’ years2. While useful in describing spending patterns, that framework is less valuable as a guide to client decision-making, because this is not how clients tend to think. An Australian study3 from 2024 found that retires actually divide the future into two: the near-term future they can vividly imagine, and the distant future they struggle to picture. 

The concept is also consistent with a wider body of behavioural research into retirement decision-making. Biases such as myopia, present bias and hyperbolic discounting limit our ability to plan effectively for the long term. Some researchers4 have gone further, suggesting we think in terms of two selves: our present self and our future self. The separation of the two can make future planning decisions difficult and bring procrastination and inertia to the fore.

Chapter one: the retirement clients can see

When clients first sit down to plan retirement, the part of the future they engage with most readily is the period immediately after the end of full-time work. In this chapter, broadly ages 60 to 75, retirees can vividly imagine how they will spend their time, the lifestyle they want to maintain and the experiences they hope to enjoy while health and independence are intact. 

Because this period feels tangible, decision-making is driven by aspirations rather than anxiety. Client discussions are framed around enabling this lifestyle, and they are typically receptive to strategies that support spending, flexibility and access to capital.

However, there are already opposing forces at work. The pressure to make the most of retirement now sits alongside the knowledge that the future is uncertain. As a result, many retirees hold back from experiences they aspire to, struggling to confidently enjoy this stage of life.

Confidence therefore becomes a critical facilitator of decisions and actions. When clients feel assured that their long-term needs have been considered, they are more willing to spend and commit to experiences. Without that assurance, even financially secure retirees may default to caution.

Chapter two: the retirement clients cannot see

By contrast, the period beyond the first 15 years exists largely as an abstraction in clients’ minds. They know it will occur, but struggle to picture what it will look like or what their financial needs will be.

Clients worry about longevity, medical costs, market downturns and loss of independence, but cannot specify the magnitude or timing of these risks. Because this future is distant and difficult to imagine, it is processed less through detailed planning than through fear-based heuristics.

That often leads clients to defer decisions, preserve capital, avoid irreversible commitments and favour flexibility, even when it comes at the expense of better financial outcomes.

Confidence again plays a central role, but differently. Clients want to know that essential needs will be met regardless of how circumstances unfold. When that reassurance is absent, reluctance to spend or commit resources in the first chapter intensifies.

Behavioural evidence of the two-chapter mindset

The two-chapter mindset is not merely conceptual – it translates into observable behaviours.

Australian data shows that retirement spending typically declines over time. One estimate5 suggests that the median retired couple’s expenditure falls by more than one-third as they move from peak spending in early retirement into older age, with the decline accelerating after age 80.

Decision inertia is another clear pattern. Research6 has found that many Australians see retirement planning as complicated, and that in the face of that complexity they default to simple behaviours. Around half of retirees with account-based pensions draw only the legislated minimum, and many leave superannuation in accumulation accounts even after retirement.

In many cases these choices are sub-optimal, and reflect retirees’ uncertainty, inertia and the cognitive burden of navigating retirement decisions, as well as a strong preference for flexibility. 

The irreversibility barrier

Decisions about the distant future become especially difficult when they are perceived as hard to reverse. Yet the strategies advisers often use to provide security for later life, such as establishing a layer of guaranteed future income, can require exactly this type of commitment.

Research7 suggests that when retirees perceive a strategy as not easily unwound, they 'apply an ‘irrevocability aversion discount’ to its benefits. Regret aversion amplifies the effect. Rather than risk making the wrong call, they delay, dilute or avoid commitments altogether.

From insight to action

For advisers, the implications are practical.

First, critical decisions need to be prioritised early, while clients are entering retirement and are still capable of engaging with complex strategies. Establishing a durable foundation for later life, particularly in terms of income security and longevity protection, can allow clients to approach the early years of retirement with greater confidence.

Second, confidence is created when clients feel that uncertainty has been managed in a way that preserves both security and control. 

Finally, income layering offers a way to reconcile the tension between certainty and flexibility. By combining sources of income with different characteristics of certainty, liquidity and reversibility, advisers can secure essential later-life needs while preserving access to capital and adaptability. In effect, clients are not just diversifying income streams; they are also diversifying commitment levels.

Take a more human view of retirement planning

The two-chapter lens humanises retirement planning by recognising clients’ cognitive and emotional limitations. and the barriers to optimal decision making.

Planning frameworks that secure essential lifetime needs early, preserve flexibility for evolving priorities and build confidence across both chapters are more likely to overcome decision paralysis.

When that happens, clients are better able to enjoy the retirement they can see without fearing the one they cannot.

 

References

1. https://smcaustralia.com/app/uploads/2025/10/251028-SMC-Retirement-Report-2_Final-.pdf

2. https://www.morganstanley.com/cs/pdf/10078209-Retirement-Spending-Reality.pdf

3. Allianz Retire+ research: retiree insights, November 2024, conducted by fiftyfive5, part of the Accenture Song group.

4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3949005/pdf/nihms550109.pdf

5. https://au.milliman.com/en/insight/analysis-retirees-spending-falls-faster-than-expected-into-old-age

6. https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Simpler-Super-Grattan-Institute-Report.pdf

7. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID4555546_code3520657.pdf?abstractid=4555546&mirid=1

 

This material is issued by Allianz Australia Life Insurance Limited, ABN 27 076 033 782, AFSL 296559 (Allianz Retire+). Allianz Retire+ is a registered business name of Allianz Australia Life Insurance Limited. This information is current as at March 2026 unless otherwise specified and is for general information purposes only. It is not comprehensive or intended to give financial product advice. Any advice provided in this material does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on anything contained in this material, you should speak to your financial adviser and consider the appropriateness of the information received, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. No person should rely on the content of this material or act on the basis of anything stated in this material. Allianz Retire+ and its related entities, agents or employees do not accept any liability for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly from any use of this material. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. 

 

Any information on this website does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. For personal financial advice please speak to your financial adviser. Products will be issued by Allianz Australia Life Insurance Limited, ABN 27 076 033 782, AFSL 296559.

Allianz Retire+ is the business name of Allianz Australia Life Insurance Limited. By using this website you agree to access this Financial Services Guide.